Acknowledgements

Chapter 1. Introduction: Qu'y puis-je ?

Chapter 2. Research context: Locating this study in the existing literature

Chapter 3. Methodology

Chapter 4. Learning from our failures: Lessons from FairCoop

Chapter 5. Different ways of being and relating: The Deep Adaptation Forum

Chapter 6. Towards new mistakes

Chapter 7. Conclusion

______________

Annex 3.1 Participant Information Sheets

Annex 3.2 FairCoop Research Process

Annex 3.3 Using the Wenger-Trayner Evaluation Framework in DAF

Annex 4.1 A brief timeline of FairCoop

Annex 5.1 DAF Effect Data Indicators

Annex 5.2 DAF Value-Creation Stories

Annex 5.3 Case Study: The DAF Diversity and Decolonising Circle

Annex 5.4 Participants’ aspirations in DAF social learning spaces

Annex 5.5 Case Study: The DAF Research Team

Annex 5.6 RT Research Stream: Framing And Reframing Our Aspirations And Uncertainties

References

This annex displays the list of effect data indicators (or questions used to monitor these indicators, especially during interviews) that I have derived iteratively from research conversations and surveys disseminated in DAF. They are presented here, classified by social learning cycle (see Annex 3.3 for more details).

IMMEDIATE

  • Changes in ways of interacting with people within or outside DAF
  • Time spent per day or week on DAF platform
  • Sense of trust and belonging
  • Quality of facilitation and safety of DAF spaces
  • Possibility to be open and vulnerable in DAF spaces
  • Feeling stimulated and energised
  • Former volunteers or participants: statements made on leaving the social learning space or decreasing their engagement

POTENTIAL

  • Changes in ways of interacting with people within or outside DAF
  • Changes in ways of relating with people with non-DA mindsets
  • New friendships and connections
  • Finding new useful resources
  • Community responses to media attention, criticisms of DA, etc.
  • Learning about racism, colonialism, etc.
  • More openness to others’ perspectives and life experiences
  • Deeper or more critical self-understanding
  • Fruitful collaborations and mentoring
  • Losing social connections due to DA involvement
  • New self-awareness
  • New self-organising skills
  • More self-confidence

APPLIED

  • Improved ability to voice one’s disagreement with status quo
  • Changes in one’s professional practice
  • Speaking confidently about DA and collapse
  • Learning by creating artefacts or other resources
  • Putting new learning into action via team collaboration
  • Changes in dealing with one’s emotions
  • Experimenting with new practices
  • Sharing information and practices outside DAF
  • Starting new projects or circles

REALISED

  • Changes in personal circles with regards to DA/collapse
  • Changes in professional practice (own and others’)
  • Introducing more people to the forum
  • Sharing information about DA/DAF publicly
  • Feeling better able to share one’s feelings openly
  • Feeling better able to integrate and transform one’s feelings

ENABLING

  • Receiving help or mentoring from other DAF participants
  • Lack of support or disagreements with network leadership
  • Useful rules and agreements in DAF groups
  • Helpful or unhelpful technology
  • Being helped to find one’s way within or outside DAF
  • Finding support from a small group or community of practice

STRATEGIC

  • Finding that one’s contributions are valued or understood
  • Understanding the wider ecosystem and its stakeholders

ORIENTING

  • Experiencing other (non-DA) collapse spaces
  • Understanding how and where one fits within DAF
  • Making connections with other movements (e.g. Transition Towns)
  • Using guides and other resources to find one’s way

TRANSFORMATIVE

  • Relating to self, others, or the universe in very new ways
  • New awareness of one’s place within the planetary metabolism